Home > Education & Training, People > Do You Really Need an HR Team?

Do You Really Need an HR Team?

August 22nd, 2008 Leave a comment Go to comments

I have been thinking about the role of HR in a business and a question that goes through my mind is “do you really need an HR team”.  Now i can hear the chorous of “of course you do” – however the question is what is it that HR does that a line manager cant do themselves?

Lets think through the key people issues of hiring, firing, remuneration, motivation, feedback, culture and development.

Hiring

Now this is the obvious area where a manager will say to an HR person “please find me a new sales person” for example.  Well that is great – but the reality is if the successful candidate is not someone that the manager wants working for them, then the candidate shouldnt get the job.  In many cases the HR team act as a gate keeper – a filter – the problem with this is that often only the people HR like get through and unless HR truly understand the business and the culture, the wrong people can be placed in front of the line manager to select from.  When i was at McKinsey and Co, the consultants did the filtering of resumes, the interviewing and the selection.  Like hiring like! Therefore an arguement can be mounted that at best, HR should act as a process manager for the recruitment process.

Firing

OK – a tough one.  I know a number of managers who defer the firing of people to HR.  Now this is a weak way of managing a business and the firing of people is something that should be done by the line manager.  HR can be there to help and make sure that the correct procedures are followed, however they should not be any more than that.

Remuneration

In many businesses, HR is responsible for setting the pay scales. Well i dont agree with this.  THe market should be setting the pay scales and people should be paid for performance not pay for position.  When a manager is doing their budget, they need to think about the people, understand what the market is paying and then make recommendations within the budget framework as to what someone should be paid.  The finance team can then look at the salary costs in total and make recommendations back to the line management as to what the overall salary line item should look like.

Motivation and Rewards

Well i think that this goes without saying.  Often motivation is tied to culture and to the intrinsic rewards of the job.  This is something that HR can not affect as only the line manager can.  Line managers should also think about non-financial rewards as motivators – such as employee of the month, on the spot awards etc.  Often these are overlooked by HR and it is the line manager who is best positioned to understand the effectiveness of these rewards and the awarding of them.  Once again, the role HR can play here is a process one, of making sure that rewards occur.

Feedback

How often do you hear that it is “performance review time”.  Well i think that if a line manager is really doing their job well, they will be providing constant feedback to staff members on how they are going and the formal review process is simply the documentation of this feedback.  Too many manager dont provide constant feedback and use the performance review process as a way of unloading their issues all at once – often with unexpected results.  The role HR should provide here is process management (again) in ensuring that there is consistent approach to performance reviews and that they get done.  All of which an “on the ball” line manager can do themselves.

Culture

Now dont get me started.  A fish rots from the head and therefore it is the senior management and line managers who must take responsibility for managing and developing the culture.  Employees watch everything that a manager does and this gives them signals as to what is right and what is wrong in the organisation.  The role an HR team might be able to play is in surveying the staff to understand attitudes across a business however these often get unweildly and provide little true insight into the business.  Perhaps the best thing to do is just go and chat with the staff – it is amazing what they will tell you.

Development and Training

The final area is development and training.  Well the requirements across a business for this are many and varied and it is only the line manager and the employee that truly knows what is important for their long term development.  The line manager should take on the responsibility for developing their people and use the training budget allocated to them.  Perhaps the role that HR can play is to ensure that compliance training – like OH&S – are undertaken.  Once again, this is something that is very process driven.

I guess having written this, the answer that i come to is that there is a role for HR in the business however in top businesses it is probably more process management and clearly in support to the line management.  I think it is up to the line managers to truly take control of the HR and people management part of their business.

The more a line manager uses HR as a crutch, the more they lose touch with their number one asset – their people!

  1. Internal Conferences – Building the Team

    Each year we hold a conference for all staff.  This year we are actually holding two – one in Brussels and one in Melbourne.  The main reason we do these conferences is to ensure that everyone is connected with the...

  2. Building a Business on Passion

    I was recently thinking about what makes a great person in the business i run and the common trait that kept coming to mind was PASSION. It seems to me that my team members who are truly great are those...

  3. Education and Training – The Back Bone of the Business

    I recently has the following comment on my site Curious whether you have any  leadership development requirements at your company? Thinking about the idea of implementing Six Sigma, getting prepared to suggest.  Something like all managers required to become green belts,...

  4. Making Accounting Roles Exciting

    How does one make an accounting/reporting role exciting? I was cracking my head after reading your blog on how to attract excellent people. How does one start the conversation to do a hard sell on accountants? In most cases it’s...

  5. Building a Great Team – 250 People in a Room

    I am busy preparing for our twice a year full staff get together.  For each of the last 6 years, i have flown in all staff from around the country to participate in 3 days of bonding, learning, sharing and...

Categories: Education & Training, People Tags:
  1. August 22nd, 2008 at 07:36 | #1

    With record low unemployment, high staff turnover, the high cost of staff turnover in knowledge/relationship intensive service businesses, generation Y employees being more demanding than ever, the existing pressures on line managers, the importance of culture consistency across a business… do you really want to push this onto line managers? Maybe sales and CCC should do all the marketing too, they are the closest to the customer? I believe focus, university training, a strategic overview, market research/awareness and independence count for something.

  2. August 22nd, 2008 at 20:32 | #2

    Scott

    Thanks for your comment. I have a couple of thoughts

    Firstly, i think everyone in the business should be involved in marketing in some way. Marketing is about the development, promotion and sale of a product. Therefore the CCC and sales should have a view on the product specs as well as they should help market the product as they are always chatting with customers.

    Secondly, i think the management of people is not something that you can outsource to another part of the business. People are the heart and soul of the business and the key responsibility of line management. Yes there are competing priorities for a line management HOWEVER if the peole who report to the line manager are not happy, not right, there is the wrong culture and so on, then the line manager will never achieve their goals.

    Thanks for your thoughts … i love a good debate.

  3. Jay Speider
    September 10th, 2008 at 11:56 | #3

    Wow. Where to start here… Perhaps since Simon is from Australia and therefore decended from criminals, he has no real sense of employment law and its intricacies. The exposure policies and thinking like this would create far outweigh any savings to be had in not having an HR group engaged with the employee population. The services provided are full time. The issues managed by HR should never be something relegated to part time or some minor subset of a line manager position. Without focus there can be no excellence. Without excellence there can be no goal. Without goals there can be no achievement.

    Sorry about the criminal comment….

  4. October 10th, 2008 at 09:33 | #4

    As a convict like Simon (I live in Australia) I am well qualified, on that basis at least, to respond. I am also an HR Manager. So, let the fun begin.

    I agree with Simon!

    Managers, doing their job well, would need HR, much less rely on, far less, if at all. If you work in a large organisation that has some good managers this is proven time and again if you stop and realise there are some managers who just get the people things done – without any HR help! They’d manage performance without performance review forms (yes, they would!). They’d fire people humanely etc etc etc.

    No argument. So, stop defending HR.

    On the other hand, and I experience this daily, there are managers who don’t get the people things done at all. And I can say that using Simon’s examples alone.

    They don’t care about T&D, they care little for culture, motivation and rewards. They admit it, well they do to me!

    So, for the safety of the company in some respects and to assist with improving business perfomance those managers need HR, or some level of Jiminy Cricket conscience, to help them manage their people well.

    And remember, the only purpose of HR is to help the company get the most out of their people to drive the business performance up. That is the ONLY purpose of HR – bar none!

    Ah yes, let the debate continue! :)

  5. erin
    October 28th, 2008 at 20:19 | #5

    Who trains the manager to manage? Who supports the managers through these subjects you mention? I have been working over 15 years and STILL have not had a good manager. But I have had good HR support. I agree with Bill – managers are usually not able to handle employee issues and regulations on their own, they are not in touch with the market data of salaries, nor does your average joe manager think about developing their employees ever so timely. So yes, you do need HR, but perhaps a different breed of HR than what you are used to. We are business partners, not time/hogging, process sloths. Managers should be managing the business and HR is a partner in that…not a burden.

  1. September 9th, 2008 at 09:01 | #1